Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Ender's Game: What I Missed the First 20 Times Around.

[Content note: racism, homophobia]

Ender's Game

Like many people, I loved Ender's Game as a child. It was my favorite book; I must have reread it at least once or twice every year, starting when I was in middle school. I loved the plot; I found Ender to be a sympathetic hero; the details of the writing grabbed my imagination. I only recently, however, after a long break, sat down to reread it.

And what. the. everloving. fuck.

On page 65, Ender has the following exchange with his friend, Alai:
They grinned. Then Ender said, "Better invite Bernard."
Alai cocked an eyebrow. "Oh?"
"And Shen."
"That slanty-eyed butt-wiggler?"
"Slanty-eyed"? Since when was that in there? 
"And Shen.''
"That slanty-eyed butt-wiggler?"
Ender decided that Alai was joking. "Hey, we can't all be niggers."
No. Ender- Ender, who I respected and who I identified and sympathized with- just called someone a nigger. Just called Alai a nigger. Alai, whose open friendship meant the world to Ender, whose friendship meant the world to me and had stayed with me as I moved on from the books. Ender just called Alai a nigger. That is then followed by these two lines:
Alai grinned. "My grandpa would've killed you for that."
"My great great grandpa would have sold him first."
It's a mark of my privilege that I didn't notice this exchange when I was younger. Later editions of the book were modified* to take out the word, but I know that my copy contained Ender calling someone a nigger. And that when I was a kid, I didn't notice. Or care.


Orson Scott Card

The story, of course, gets worse. I had heard for a long time that Orson Scott Card (henceforth OSC for brevity) was a bigoted homophobe in real life. I had not known the extent. Wikipedia quotes him as calling for laws that ban gay sex to "remain on the books... to be used when necessary to send a clear message that those who flagrantly violate society's regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society". So, basically: gay people are subhuman. Card also apparently believes that "the dark secret of homosexual society—the one that dares not speak its name—is how many homosexuals first entered into that world through a disturbing seduction or rape or molestation or abuse, and how many of them yearn to get out of the homosexual community and live normally." Yeah, okay, apparently all we gay people have just been molested into being gay, and all we want is to live "normally." Okay, bigot, how about you shut the fuck up.

But I had not seen his bigotry run into his work, having not reread it since before I was aware of these issues. I had not seen the link between his (stupid, wrong) non-fiction theorizings and his fiction. I had been trying to be careful, in fact, to keep my own prejudices against Mormonism (which has some racial and gender-based stuff that I am not going to get into here, as well as policies on homosexuality, that I strongly disagree with) from biasing my view of OSC as an individual. And then I read the following response to a teacher's question about why he had chosen to release an edition with the word "nigger" removed:

Even as the old obscenities dealing with sex and excrement were unleashed upon the public, new obscenities moved from the realm of the merely indecorous to the sinful. What f* and s* (and worse words) had once been, now n* has become. And, just as there were prudes who screamed in outrage and demanded that any work containing those old bad words must be banned, so we have a new group of prudes making identical demands about works containing the new bad word. 
... 
Such a word, today, is n*. In the scene just quoted, I had Ender using the word to wake Alai up to the fact that by calling Shen "slanty-eyed," Alai was being racist. A sort of tit-for-tat response: If you're going to call my East Asian friend "slanty-eyed," then you choose to live in the kind of world where you would be called "n*." Morally, this is clearly (to me, at least) a rejection of the kind of world where people call each other names based on superficial racial characteristics.

Oh fuck no.

First off, let's talk about how you chose, as a white person, to create a circumstance in which a black person would have to be taught about how to not be racist by a white person. Let's just take a look at that.

Second, let's talk about how there is a distinction between "prudes" and "people that you have offended by being racist." Shit and fuck? Those are words that people might feel offended by. They are "strong language." The word nigger's offensiveness does not stem from how "strong" it is, it stems from how it is a word that was used (and is being used, now) BY WHITE PEOPLE to OPPRESS BLACK PEOPLE. So having Ender (a white person) call Alai (a black person) a nigger is not at all the same as having people of any race say "fuck you" to other people. It replicates the power imbalance and the violence that we, if we are not racist scumbags, are trying to move AWAY from in the US. There is no prudishness involved here. This is not a case of feeling that the word is improper, this is the use of a word that actually hurts people and contributes to systemic inequality.

Thirdly, let's talk about that second paragraph there. The moral that OSC seems to be trying to impart is apparently: if you, as a person of color, say something racist, you deserve to be put in your place by having someone use racial violence against you. You "choose to live in the kind of world where you would be called 'n*'." 

But there's no way that a white person- there's no way that Ender- would ever be at risk of making that choice. They could never choose to open themselves up to racial invective, because there aren't any structurally racist words that apply to white people. If there were, the logical conclusion of that scene would have been Ender getting his comeuppance for using a racist term: after calling Alai a nigger, Ender would have been called something racist. But that didn't happen, because white people apparently don't have to follow the same "tit-for-tat" rules that people of color do.

So my feelings on Ender's Game are now basically: fuck that shit. I loved this book, but OSC, while he may be a gifted writer, is a racist, homophobic, sexist douchebag, and that stuff doesn't just magically not get included in his writing. It's there, and I hate it, and I don't think I'll ever be able to read this book, that was my favorite book, again.



*Transcription:
They grinned. Then Ender said, "Better invite Bernard." 
Alai cocked an eyebrow. "Oh?" 
"And Shen." 
"That little butt-wiggler?" 
Ender decided that Alai was joking. "If you didn't hold yours so tight it would wiggle, too."

Note: I've chosen not to discuss some other problematic portions of the book, including the gender essentialism (apparently girls tend not to pass the tests to get into Battle School, because there are "too many centuries of evolution working against them" or some bullshit); the whole thing about how OSC has written it so that Jews think they're the shit, but they actually suck; a whole damn lot of adults saying "yes, we're abusing these kids, but it's totally justified because: alien menace, so we'll joke about how horrible this is and then do it anyway!"; and the entire structure of Ender's growth, which reads like a perfect portrayal of someone who is being abused justifying their learned abuse of others.

10 comments:

  1. I had the same experience! It sucks so much to discover these things about childhood favorites. Card is such a great author, I wish I could still enjoy reading his work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You people are stupid.. Ender was obviously just joking with alai, no offense was meant.. I've read the book 30 times and not once have I thought that OSC was making Ender racist..
    I just felt that needed to be said even though this article is old..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excuse me? There are no racist terms thrown around at white people? Really? Have you ever been outside of America? Wake the f**k up. I'm not American, but I've lived there. I have to say, coming from a background without racial issues, where I had black friends as a child and didn't even notice, where I didn't know what n****r meant, didn't know black people thought white people couldn't dance and didn't have big penises and couldn't fight, that I thought American black people were on the whole very f**king racist indeed. It was shocking to go somewhere skin colour could become a social divide. It's not a political divide, but it is still social. It was shocking to see that white people and black people have different accents, and don't hang out together in school. Suddenly I wasn't allowed to notice. When I was a child it was no more significant than a friend having a different colour of hair. We noticed. We probably talked about it, but we didn't know what "race" was, and had we learned, we wouldn't have thought it significant. Taboos make a thing significant. America is shooting itself in the foot, and must get over its ridiculous sensitivities if it's ever going to evolve. OSC is absolutely right that in an evolved culture, like Canada or the UK, n****r is just a f**king swear word. It has special significance to Americans because you kept organised, state sanctioned racism longer than any other 1st world nation on Earth, and kept slavery for around two centuries longer than Britain. (That is why the American revolution happened--that and the fact that Britain refused to break its treaties with the Iroquois and the Cherokee.) It's natural that Americans are more sensitive than other people, given how recently things were horrifyingly unequal in your society, but it's time for America to grow the f**k up and get over it. Join the rest of the world in not thinking race is in any way significant (which includes thinking that noticing it doesn't make you a racist) and you'll feel much better.

    That said, Orson Scott Card was a racist, homophobic sexist bastard. He was a Mormon. That's part of their religion, which is true, whether or not you think I'm prejudiced for saying it. Read their bible. It's disgusting, though not much more so than every other religious text, but that's another story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ????? I don't even know where to start? Did you just say that the non-American parts of the world don't think "race is in any way significant"? Have you heard of genocide? Because I'm pretty sure that genocide has occurred outside of the US, and it's usually kind of racially motivated. Also, Canada and the UK have an "evolved culture" that somehow negates racism? Britain occupied India until 1947. First Nations peoples in Canada weren't allowed to vote without giving up their tribal membership until 1960. America is fucking racist as shit, but don't tell me that the rest of the world isn't. If you pretend that it's only a problem in one part of the world, you're ignoring it everywhere else.

      Also, yes, it's prejudiced to say that members of a religion are inherently racist, homophobic, or sexist. People can practice a religion while acknowledging the bias in the texts and not internalizing the violent messages (though OSC definitely did not do so.)

      Delete
  4. I recently read this novel and found the exchange very funny and upon further reflection one of the books strongest moments.
    For me it showed that their friendship is not affected by emotional baggage of generations past (they have enough of their own) and also how creepily manipulative Ender is. I understand your point about the term 'nigger' used by a white to a black being all kinds of loaded and the author being a homophobe and insensitive about race issues. But Alai and Ender are not defined by that, but rather by their shared experience. As they openly acknowledge the shock value these words are supposed to have and bond over the fact, that they both don't give a fuck.
    Alai is not put in his place here at all, as you wrote, that wouldn't have been in Enders' interest. If you reread the chapter you learn that Enders goal was to a) win Alai over as a friend, use his therefore increased social pull to b) make him the leader of his little group, so that the bully Bernard doesn't get to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. Neither Alai nor Ender gives a crap. And that is as it should be. The fact that you're thinking a white boy is "teaching" a black boy about racism misses the point. That would've been the case if Alai was put in his place. He wasn't. Ender called him out on it. The fact that he happens to be white does not matter. I see the two of them as making fun of their ancestors being so close minded, actually.

      Delete
    2. Disgusting.

      Reading people defend the use of the word in that book is repulsive and offensive.

      Orson obviously meant it to be racist which is why he had Ender say his great grandfather would have sold the other boy's grandfather.

      How is it that Ender's Great-Grandfather owned slaves? That would mean Ender was born around the time as Orson Scott Card and NOT the future!


      Delete
  5. Alai grinned. He's not shamed or put in his place. At that point in the book, Alai was in a position of power (Bernard's #2 guy in the main in-group) and Ender is the outcast with no friends. Alai isn't threatened by Ender at all. Ender hints that Alai's being unfair to Shen, and Alai gets the hint and accepts both Shen and Ender, his social inferiors, into his in-group. Not to mention that Alai takes control of that in-group and becomes the nearly-universally voted leader of the entire launchy group. Later in the book, Alai is portrayed not only as Ender's closest friend, and as someone who shares several very touching moments with him, but as the most brilliant commander other than Ender, the one who could come closest to controlling the most and doing what Ender does. Alai's Muslim faith is also portrayed positively several times.

    It might also help to point out, as you never do, that Alai is African, not American. It's not like they're working under the confines of the Black American/White American post-slavery dynamic.

    ReplyDelete